Part of the Bay Area News Group

Westlands farmers bank on Delta House aspirants

By Josh Richman
Tuesday, July 31st, 2012 at 5:42 pm in 2012 Congressional Election, economy, Environment, Jerry McNerney, John Garamendi, U.S. House, water.

Two Republican House candidates from the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta area took campaign cash from downstate farmers whom would benefit from a new water plan at the Delta’s expense, the area’s current lawmakers say.

Kim Vann, a Colusa County Supervisor challenging Rep. John Garamendi, D-Fairfield, in the newly drawn 3rd Congressional District received $5,000 from the California Westside Farmers PAC in late April. Ricky Gill, a Lodi law graduate challenging Rep. Jerry McNerney, D-Stockton, in the newly drawn 9th Congressional District, received $5,000 from the PAC in late June.

The PAC acts on behalf of farmers in the Westlands Water District, an agricultural powerhouse in the otherwise arid west reaches of the San Joaquin Valley. McNerney’s campaign noted today that Sarah Woolf, a member of the Westlands board of directors, is the PAC’s treasurer.

A new Bay Delta Conservation Plan proposal announced last week by Gov. Jerry Brown and U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar includes a $14 billion tunnel system beneath the Delta to ship water southward, largely for agricultural purposes. Garamendi and McNerney are among lawmakers who say this plan would benefit Westlands farmers while economically and environmentally devastating the Delta.

“This development is a huge breach of the public trust,” McNerney had said last week. “The families, farmers, and small business owners in northern California stand to have their livelihoods destroyed. This will have ruinous consequences for our local economy at a time when we already struggle with record unemployment.”

McNerney campaign spokeswoman Lauren Smith said Tuesday that Gill has claimed to side with Delta area residents, “but his willingness to cozy up to the people intent on robbing us of our water, ultimately causing economic ruin for our area farmers and small business owners, is deeply disturbing. Once again, Ricky Gill has shown that he just doesn’t get it. It’s clear that peripheral canal supporters believe they have an ally and advocate in Ricky Gill and a staunch and vocal opponent in Jerry McNerney.”

Not so, replied Gill spokesman Colin Hunter.

Ricky Gill“Ricky has been and remains opposed to any plan to divert water around the Delta because of the devastating effect it could have on farmers in this region including his family, which has been farming here for 30 years,” he said. “Unlike Jerry McNerney, who carries an ‘F’ rating from the American Farm Bureau, Ricky intends to be an advocate for farmers when he’s elected to Congress.”

(Taking a quick glance around the interwebs, I see the American Farm Bureau rated McNerney at 41 percent in 2011; also, here’s a more specific rundown of how he voted on issues of importance to the bureau.)

Hunter called the new Delta plan “the culmination of Jerry McNerney’s failed tenure in Congress. He’s been sitting on the sidelines for five years and effectively allowed this to happen.”

As for the PAC money, Hunter said, “Ricky doesn’t see eye-to-eye with Westlands on several issues, but they are farmers like Ricky and they know that Ricky is going to stand up for farmers up and down the valley when he’s in Congress” on issues from free trade to regulatory reform. “McNerney is on the wrong side of all of them.”

Gill’s campaign also Tuesday was touting new poll results Tuesday showing Gill and McNerney in a dead heat. (UPDATE @ 8:07 p.m.: McNerney’s camp just produced its own new poll showing he has a commanding lead.)

In the 3rd District, Garamendi last week had said the tunnel proposal “could wreak havoc on the Delta and the jobs it sustains and put existing water rights in the Delta and Northern California at risk.”

“It is possible for California to solve its water problems, but the Delta and Northern California counties must be at the table, and it will take a comprehensive, multifaceted approach, not just a piece of plumbing in the Delta,” he said. “We must address the needs of all Californians by prioritizing storage, conservation, recycling, levee improvements, and habitat restoration.”

Kim VannVann campaign manager Alee Lockman emailed today that Vann “believes that any conveyance plans must also include authorizing language for increasing water storage. The proposed plan is by no means a perfect solution and there are a number of local issues at stake, but the dialogue of the past week underscores the need for all of us to come together and work toward a solution that will best serve the entire state’s water needs.”

Asked specifically about the PAC money, Lockman replied there’s “nothing to add that hasn’t already been included. We need an open dialogue and we need to find a solution that works best for the entire state of California.”

The PAC also has given $10,000 to U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., as well as $5,000 each to Rep. Jim Costa, D-Calif.; Rep. Jeff Denham, R-Turlock; Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Clovis; and House Majority Whip Kevin McCarthy, R-Bakersfield. Among other House challengers, the PAC has given $5,000 each to Republican David Valadao in the 21st District and to Democrat Denise Ducheny in the 51st District.

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

  • Elwood

    They seem to be spreading the money around.

    Difficult to draw any conclusions from this story.

  • Chariot LLC

    The Lake Research memo is so transparently manipulated – it’s an example of what gives pollsters a bad reputation.

    Ask yourself this – if Jerry McNerney really had polling on July 12 (see poll memo) that showed him up 16 points, would he have been hiding it all this time?

    For credibility’s sake, consider that the non partisan Cook report rates this race as Dem+2. (The Gill poll tracks that score: McNerney 47, Gill 45.)

    By contrast, the ‘curious’ McNerney poll memo would have you believe that Ricky Gill – who got 40 percent in the primary (out of 53% total GOP primary vote), has now dropped to 33% – a full 20 points below the GOP candidates’ June primary total, and even below the McNerney poll’s own internal GOP registration number (38%). Again, no serious analyst would give credence to that.

    McNerney’s pollsters would also have you believe that Jerry McNerney, who is under-performing Obama’s ballot score by seven points, is somehow still thundering ahead with independents by 24 points (!) despite being less-known in his new Congressional district.

    Really, now.

    So inquiring minds want to know – what did McNerney’s poll REALLY say – and why was he hiding it?

    Most likely explanation – the incredulous ballot score quoted by Team McNerney is the so-called ‘INFORMED ballot’ score – the score they got AFTER attacking Ricky Gill with a series of ‘push’ questions.

    And in that case they’re still at only 49%.

    That makes more sense, and would be something for Jerry McNerney to hide, indeed.

  • Pingback: Gill Accepts Money from Peripheral Canal Supporters | East County Today

  • Josh Richman

    @#1: Actually, not so difficult. Feinstein and Costa quickly issued statements praising the Brown/Salazar plan, while McCarthy, Nunes and Denham for years have favored more pumping, as does Valadao. Ducheny has a long-standing reputation as one of the Legislature’s water-policy experts and worked closely with the ag industry on a key water conservation bill a few years ago; here’s her voting record on ag issues over the past few years.