Part of the Bay Area News Group

Digging deeper into Jerry McNerney’s residency

By Josh Richman
Wednesday, August 1st, 2012 at 3:58 pm in 2012 Congressional Election, Jerry McNerney, U.S. House, Uncategorized.

Rep. Jerry McNerney on Wednesday said there’s nothing to a Stockton Record story questioning whether he actually now lives in Stockton, where he re-registered to vote and cast a ballot for June’s primary, or if he still lives at his longtime home in Pleasanton.

Jerry McNerney“I am living in Stockton,” McNerney said, calling from his Washington, D.C. office. “The transition has been more difficult than I expected, has taken longer than I expected … but I’ll be home (from Washington) in August and I’ll be there the whole month.”

Pressed on where he spends most of his nights while in the Golden State, McNerney replied, “when I’m in California, I’m spending a significant amount of time in Stockton, I haven’t counted the nights.” Asked about his legal residence, he replied, “Legally, it’s absolutely Stockton – I’m registered to vote there, I’m paying bills there, I’m sleeping there – it’s absolutely my legal address.”

The Democrat is seeking a fourth term in the newly drawn 9th Congressional District, which doesn’t include Pleasanton; however, a candidate isn’t required to live in the House district in which he or she runs, only in the same state. The question is whether McNerney ran afoul of the state Election Code by registering and voting in Stockton.

One of the key code sections seems to be:

2026. The domicile of a Member of the Legislature or a Representative in the Congress of the United States shall be conclusively presumed to be at the residence address indicated on that person’s currently filed affidavit of registration.

On its face, it sounds like this means that wherever a lawmaker is currently registered is his or her domicile, which would put McNerney in the clear. But the campaign of Ricky Gill, McNerney’s Republican challenger, today provided a 2011 California Court of Appeal decision that might indicate otherwise.

Lots more, after the jump…

That ruling, in the case brought against state Sen. Roderick Wright, D-Inglewood, said “this conclusive presumption applies only if the address indicated on the legislator’s currently filed affidavit of voter registration is one of the legislator’s legal residences.”

Gill’s campaign said the Record’s evidence – including that McNerney merely rented the Stockton home but still owns, and claims a homeowner’s tax exemption for, the Pleasanton home; that his car is still registered in Pleasanton; and that sightings of McNerney at the Stockton home have been spotty – overwhelmingly shows the Stockton home isn’t McNerney’s legal residence.

Gill issued a statement saying “McNerney’s false residency claim is just one more insult to the people of Stockton and San Joaquin County, where I was born and raised. We deserve better than an outsourced Congressman who believes he is above the law.”

James Fisfis, Gill’s campaign consultant, added that “voter fraud is a serious matter. This case needs to be investigated thoroughly to give voters confidence that the same rules apply to everyone — even politicians like Jerry McNerney.”

Accusations of fraud in voter-registration statements can be made to and investigated by either the Secretary of State’s office or a county district attorney, Chief Deputy Secretary of State Evan Goldberg said Wednesday.

“Under the law, when a person fills out a voter registration form, they’re asked to put down their home address, and then asked to sign under penalty of perjury that the information they put down in true and correct,” Goldberg said, noting state law’s definitions:

349. (a) “Residence” for voting purposes means a person’s domicile.
(b) The domicile of a person is that place in which his or her habitation is fixed, wherein the person has the intention of remaining, and to which, whenever he or she is absent, the person has the intention of returning. At a given time, a person may have only one domicile.
(c) The residence of a person is that place in which the person’s habitation is fixed for some period of time, but wherein he or she does not have the intention of remaining. At a given time, a person may have more than one residence.

“But there is no test that a person registering to vote must use the place where their car is registered, or where they take their homeowner’s exemption, or that they are there for a certain percentage of time,” Goldberg added.

Asked about the accusations, McNerney replied, “They’re going to try anything they can, that’s the way they operate, though I’m a little bit disturbed that they would stalk my wife and myself, knock on my neighbors’ doors in Stockton.”

McNerney said he expects that his wife, who has been readying their Pleasanton home to be rented out, will join him in Stockton by the end of August. “I rented a house, I’m paying for it, I’m moving stuff into it,” he said, and it shouldn’t be any wonder that with the spring primary approaching, updating his voter registration in April was among his top priorities.

Ironically, McNerney rented the Stockton home via Partners Property Management, a father-and-son outfit run by Bruce and Matthew Davies. Gill just last week cancelled a fundraiser that was to have been co-hosted by Bruce Davies, in large part because Matthew Davies was recently indicted on federal marijuana cultivation charges.

McNerney, who rented the house months before Davies’ indictment, said he’d been unaware of the connection until a reporter asked him about it Wednesday. “Good catch … I didn’t know anything about who they were.”

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

  • Chariot LLC

    In considering McNerney’s credibility here, it is worth comparing his statements to the original report.

    McNerney’s Statement on his Stockton home:
    “I’m sleeping there – it’s absolutely my legal address.”

    Stockton Record report:
    “The [McNerney's] car, a silver Toyota Camry, has remained parked at the Pleasanton home.”

    “No cars were parked outside the Stockton home during the two-week period. The home was locked and shuttered. No one answered knocks at the door. On garbage day, the bins were not put out.”

    So McNerney says is sleeping in the Stockton home, but his car wasn’t there for two weeks, no trash and the doors were shuttered?

    It appears that someone is not telling the truth.

    McNerney’s history has not earned him the benefit of the doubt.

    “He [McNerney] declared redistricting out of his hands in interviews with me last summer, but we learned in ProPublica’s story that he had hired a mapping consultant who set up a Facebook page called “OneSanJoaquin” and solicited favorable testimony for his preferred district. – L.Vorderbrueggen, CC Times, December 30, 2011

  • JohnW

    Politically speaking, Jerry’s going to have to do the usual tap dance on this.

    Ethically speaking, his old district included both his Pleasanton home and significant parts of the new district. So, this is not exactly a classic carpetbagging situation.

    Legally, and speaking of carpetbaggers, he could live in Tom McClintock’s home in Ventura and still qualify.

    Candor-wise, Jerry would get an attaboy from me if he just said, “who the hell wants to live in Stockton?

  • moderate voter

    Ricky Gill had to come up with something, poll numbers show he is trailing. Also, recently we learned some of the people behind the new peripheral canal – which I understand now is some sort of tunnel – are backing Gill for Congress.
    This stealth like alliance by Gill with So-Cal water special interest groups – the same ones that have been trying to steal our water for 40 years – spells doom for the Gill campaign. This new goofball tunnel idea would be a disaster for the Delta, so would the election of Gill to this Congressional seat. Gill will be errand boy for SoCal water special interest groups, for Wall Street, for health care company CEO’s, for hedge fund managers, and so forth. These guys are funding his campaign. If you want to watch the middle class continue to shrink, and watch the Delta shrivel up into a trickle, vote for Ricky Gill. He’s never met a fat cat special interest group he doesn’t like.
    In this race I got my money on McNerny, he fights for the regular working stiff, for jobs, for health care, for the Delta. I got McNerny stomping Ricky Gill on election day.

  • JohnW

    Re #3

    Gill has tried to distance himself from the GREAT H20 HEIST OF 2012 by saying his own family’s Northern CA farming interests are at stake if too much liquid gold moves South, while still acknowledging that he has support from some of the interests you mentioned. In other words, he’s saying, just because they give him money doesn’t mean he’ll do their bidding. That may even be true, but I wouldn’t bet my tap water on it.

    Jerry Brown is holding the levee repairs hostage to the “Peripheral Tunnel” project. If one of them bursts in an earthquake, his legacy may not be the one he’s aiming for.

    As for who’s stomping whom on election day, whether it’s the White House or key House and Senate races, I’m not placing bets. Just keeping my fingers crossed.

  • JonH

    JohnW needs to get out more. McClintock hasn’t lived in Ventura County for years.

  • JohnW

    Re: #5

    Good point, JonH. I confess to being a bit confused. According to Wikipedia (not always factually correct but often so), McClintock’s opponent in the 2008 congressional race ran TV spots criticizing McClintock for receiving $300k in per diem, even though he and his family lived most of the year in Elk Grove near Sacramento. But McClintock said the payments were justified because his legal residence was in Thousand Oaks in Ventura County. Also, McClintock couldn’t vote for himself in either the primary or general, because his legal residence was in Thousand Oaks, not in the congressional district. So, I guess you are right. He didn’t live in the Senate district he represented but got paid lots of per diem on the theory that he did.

  • Mr. 209

    @Moderate Voter (misnomer alert)

    I seem to remember McNerney breaking ground on an essential element of the peripheral canal in 2010:

    http://blogs.esanjoaquin.com/san-joaquin-river-delta/2010/10/15/welcome-to-the-groundbreaking-watch-for-snakes-and-squirrels/

    “One water exporter suggested that Thursday’s groundbreaking could be a ‘dress rehearsal for much bigger things to come’ – such as, perhaps, a peripheral canal or tunnel.”

    http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20101015/A_NEWS/10150330/-1/rss02

    Is that a shovel in McNerney’s hand? It is??

  • Pingback: Gill Gone Negative: Questions McNerney’s Residency | East County Today