Barack Obama is going to win both the popular vote as well as the Electoral College — it appears I was not “liberal” enough in my projection as he just might take NC in addition to the other states I stated he would — for a total of 347 to 191 for Romnuts.
Even so, the votes are not even counted yet and John Boehner has said “mandate be damned — no new taxes on the wealthy!” even though that is THE linchpin of the Obama campaign.
Can we say “neo-fascist dictator” Boehner? Can I get an amen?
And remember what your doctor said about getting excited when you’re off your meds!
Psychiatry . a mental disorder characterized by systematized delusions and the projection of personal conflicts, which are ascribed to the supposed hostility of others, sometimes progressing to disturbances of consciousness and aggressive acts believed to be performed in self-defense or as a mission.
baseless or excessive suspicion of the motives of others.
Man, Truthclubber, you really are an incredibly angry, foul-mouthed piece of work. You’re incapable of showing the slightest grace, even when several folks go out of their way to acknowledge the accuracy of your prediction. Talk about a sore winner.
I was right (and you and other fascists) were wrong — so STFU. Your dictator, John Boehner, has already said that this overwhelming NATIONAL decision on who should be our leader for the next four years doesn’t mean squat when it comes to who pays more in taxes — so who is out of touch? Fascists like Y-O-U.
No one else on this blog (and YOU were the best example) had the balls to put your reputation out there with any kind of numeric prediction, and allow people to judge whether you were filled with truth, or merely filled with self-aggrandizing BUL*SHI* — and as the Italians would say, you (Elwood) are a “manure cannoli”.
Truthclubber — ENOUGH. Perhaps you didn’t read my post: “avoid personal attacks on each other.” You’ve gloated sufficiently; post again if you have facts to add, but keep it clean or I’ll block you out.
Obama appointments should be interesting. Hillary earlier indicated she wouldn’t stick around for a second term but has hedged on that more recently. Eric Holder doesn’t plan to stay. Ben Bernanke has said he won’t stay when his current term is up.
We’re awaiting the vans that gather the results through out the county. They tend to hit at the same time. So, while we’re experiencing a high volume of returns, it is difficult to stop the whole process to do updates. Sorry.
The nature of accumulating results, stopping to do an update, moving those results to a separate server, and then moving the results off of that server to a remote site, simply takes time.
Elwood,nice try on the stock market angle. As I recall, the market (and my nest egg) went up quite a bit under four years of POTUS. It’s mostly about rumblings in Germany and the rest of Europe; and probably also about the Fiscal Cliff. If POTUS and the GOP don’t get down to business on the Fiscal Cliff, down 300 will seem like a picnic.
I’ve heard this for the past 8 years. Every time the market took a dip, it was Obama’s fault. But every time there was a big single day jump, or the sustained 8 year rise, we hear nothing but the Sounds of Silence.
Historically, the stock market has done better under Democratic administrations. Again, I don’t claim “cause and effect,” just lack of any evidence that the market has done better under Republicans. Same is true of job growth. Since 1952, much more job growth under Dems.