Part of the Bay Area News Group

Emken lost big to DiFi, but not as big as others

By Josh Richman
Wednesday, November 7th, 2012 at 3:57 pm in 2012 U.S. Senate election, Dianne Feinstein, U.S. Senate.

You’ve gotta give this to Elizabeth Emken of Danville – although she lost her race against U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein by almost 23 percentage points, she still had a better showing than any Republican has against Feinstein in a loooong time.

Elizabeth EmkenWith some ballots still yet to be counted, Emken finished with 38.6 percent of the vote compared to Feinstein’s 61.4 percent.

If you are surprised by this result, you haven’t been paying attention. On the other hand, Emken did comparably well.

Six years ago, former state Sen. Dick Mountjoy, R-Monrovia, finished with 35.1 percent of the vote against Feinstein; six years before that, Rep. Tom Campbell, R-Campbell, finished with 36.6 percent.

In fact, the only Republican challenging an incumbent Feinstein who outperformed Emken was Michael Huffington way back in 1994, with 44.8 percent of the vote to Feinstein’s 46.7 percent. And Huffington spent $28 million of his own money on that bid – at the time, the most expensive campaign in a non-presidential election in American history – while Emken ran her campaign this year on a half-million-dollar shoestring.

And speaking of shoes, Emken must’ve worn out a lot of shoe leather as she travelled all over the state to reach as many voters as she could in person, since a broadcast media campaign was out of the question on her budget. She also leveraged her social media presence to good advantage as a tireless tweeter. Her final tweet of the campaign came at 7:59 p.m. Tuesday night: “I’ve had the time of my life fighting dragons with you.”

Spokesman Mark Standriff said Emken was at the doctor’s office with laryngitis Wednesday afternoon, but he offered some thoughts on her behalf.

“Elizabeth worked the phones, the meetings and the media harder than any three candidates I’ve ever known. She connected with people on a personal level that they weren’t used to seeing or hearing from politicians, and she won over virtually everyone she met during the campaign,” he said.

“The political establishment should look at these results and rethink their qualification criteria for recruiting and funding candidates,” Standriff added. “She didn’t have a political track record, she couldn’t write a $5 million check, but Elizabeth had the one thing that really resonates with voters, and that’s sincerity. With her resume, her drive and the right amount of resources, just imagine what the outcome might have been.”

I didn’t make it to Feinstein’s news conference this morning in San Francisco, but a staffer tells me she “talked about the need for cooperation between the parties, her gratitude to California and her concern about the looming fiscal cliff.”

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

  • Rasta Republican

    Wow a 23 point loss is something to write about. How about this Josh. Humm,,,, anyone with a brain knows Empken had no hope of winning a US Senate seat. But she put her neck on the line for the state GOP………. don’t be suprised if there is a little political payback in terms of support for her running for Joan Buchanan’s open seat in 2014. After all name ID on a ballot is a big deal.

    Just Saying!!

  • Bruce R. Peterson Lafayette

    The song goes like this: Orangutans are skeptical of changes in their cages. Old politicians keep getting re-elected as long as they are able to talk. Republicans like Akin, impaling themselves, help the Democrats too.

  • Josh Richman

    @1 – Yep, you nailed it Rasta. I’m sure this isn’t the last we’ve heard from Emken, and the 16th Assembly District’s open seat in 2014 seems like a prime opportunity.

    @2 – How many readers do you think got the Simon & Garfunkel reference, Bruce?

  • DanvilleDemocrat

    Betting Elizabeth Emken might have some competition from the newly minted Contra Costa County Supervisor Candace Andersen for that assembly seat . . . to say nothing of the long line of Democrats hoping to succeed Joan Buchanan.

  • RR, Senile Columnist

    She’s cute.

  • John W

    According to Wiki, Emken led a successful multi-state campaign to secure insurance coverage for autism-related services. Good for her. But a Republican in favor of health insurance mandates? Heresy!

  • Sacramento data watcher

    I found this article rather confusing. She really didn’t do that well at all compared to earlier Republican candidates against Feinstein. You can’t easily compared the percentages across elections because of this year’s new “top-two” format unless you measure the spread between the Feinstein and her Republican opponent, not just the percentages. Feinstein’s share of the vote has continually increased from 55.9% in 2000 to a new of high of 61.6% (and still growing) this time around. The spread between she and Emken (23.2%)is only 1.2% lower than her vote spread in 2006 (24.4%) and the spread between she and Emken is actually 4% larger than her 2000 race (19.3%). So Emken did relatively worse then her 2000 Republican opponent this time around…which wasn’t that loooong ago! This article which attempts to use overall percentages as data points is comparing apples and oranges because of the way we now elect folks. YOu now have to use the spread between the two candidates to make an apples to apples comparison, not overall percentage. I’m not saying she didn’t run a spirited campaign on little resources, but the reporting appears to me to be inaccurate.