<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: State Football playoff idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 07:39:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: THE CAMP</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-24118</link>
		<dc:creator>THE CAMP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 17:26:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-24118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[this does look good but encinal would be a 1 seed. and you forgot berkeley. unless that was for last year. i forgot you did this]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this does look good but encinal would be a 1 seed. and you forgot berkeley. unless that was for last year. i forgot you did this</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: State Bowl picture &#124; East Bay Prep Corner</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-24054</link>
		<dc:creator>State Bowl picture &#124; East Bay Prep Corner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 01:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-24054</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] NorCal in the Division II game when Grant is D2? It shouldn&#8217;t. But until the CIF adopts my PROPOSAL the system will be flawed. If Inderkum wins out, it&#8217;s a lock. If Inderkum loses, then [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] NorCal in the Division II game when Grant is D2? It shouldn&#8217;t. But until the CIF adopts my PROPOSAL the system will be flawed. If Inderkum wins out, it&#8217;s a lock. If Inderkum loses, then [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ok</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-22253</link>
		<dc:creator>ok</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-22253</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[wheres berkeley??]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wheres berkeley??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jrock</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-11201</link>
		<dc:creator>Jrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-11201</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We should configure leagues by school enrollment.  We don&#039;t do that now- WCAL]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We should configure leagues by school enrollment.  We don&#8217;t do that now- WCAL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jrock</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-11200</link>
		<dc:creator>Jrock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Dec 2008 02:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-11200</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the north should be divided up like this:
D-1 2100+ = 80 teams
D-2 1670-2099  = 79 teams
D-3 1280-1669 = 78 teams
D-4 700-1279 = 74 teams
D-5 280-699 = 65 teams
D-6 279- = 40 teams

Get all D 6,4,2 playoff done by last weekend in Nov. December-play state championship 1st weekend in Dec.

All D 5,3,1 done by 1st week of Dec and play championship 2nd weekend of Dec.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the north should be divided up like this:<br />
D-1 2100+ = 80 teams<br />
D-2 1670-2099  = 79 teams<br />
D-3 1280-1669 = 78 teams<br />
D-4 700-1279 = 74 teams<br />
D-5 280-699 = 65 teams<br />
D-6 279- = 40 teams</p>
<p>Get all D 6,4,2 playoff done by last weekend in Nov. December-play state championship 1st weekend in Dec.</p>
<p>All D 5,3,1 done by 1st week of Dec and play championship 2nd weekend of Dec.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyle Bonagura</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-11199</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyle Bonagura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Dec 2008 01:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-11199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FAN - Ferndale should have been in, you&#039;re right. I must have accidently deleted them when I was sorting through everything in excel.

If you think I always favor East Bay teams, you haven&#039;t been reading this blog for very long. Ask Encinal. I sided with Novato before that game game and have often said Casa Roble should go to the state game over Encinal .... Or maybe you could ask Dougherty Valley, I predicted it would get crushed by Ferndale even though the DV fans were on here saying they would win.

Happy Holidays.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FAN &#8211; Ferndale should have been in, you&#8217;re right. I must have accidently deleted them when I was sorting through everything in excel.</p>
<p>If you think I always favor East Bay teams, you haven&#8217;t been reading this blog for very long. Ask Encinal. I sided with Novato before that game game and have often said Casa Roble should go to the state game over Encinal &#8230;. Or maybe you could ask Dougherty Valley, I predicted it would get crushed by Ferndale even though the DV fans were on here saying they would win.</p>
<p>Happy Holidays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeingReal</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-11198</link>
		<dc:creator>BeingReal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-11198</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HAAL Fan,
Good point on the public vs private school competition.  However, while I have no doubt about the quality of the coaches and the DLS program, I do have to question, as in my previous post, if this sucess has been influenced by outside factors.

Specifically, does the ability to admit &quot;students&quot; outside your geographical area create an unfair edge?  I contend that it does.  Further, over time this edge tends to become self perpetuating, with the more talented &quot;students&quot; seeking enrollment, not so much for the academics as for the sucess of the athletic program.

The ability to schedule public school competition only serves to validate this two tier system, much to the detriment of the public school program.  I contend that when you remove the ability to schedule competition vs public schools the private school domination will quickly dissolve as the quality of competition will be severely limited.

I offer as proof the Texas HS system.  Private schools are allowed to compete only in the TAPS (Texas Association of Private Schools) division.  There is no comparison in regards competition.  Public school 5A division teams pitted against the best TAPS schools could go home at half time and still not lose the game.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HAAL Fan,<br />
Good point on the public vs private school competition.  However, while I have no doubt about the quality of the coaches and the DLS program, I do have to question, as in my previous post, if this sucess has been influenced by outside factors.</p>
<p>Specifically, does the ability to admit &#8220;students&#8221; outside your geographical area create an unfair edge?  I contend that it does.  Further, over time this edge tends to become self perpetuating, with the more talented &#8220;students&#8221; seeking enrollment, not so much for the academics as for the sucess of the athletic program.</p>
<p>The ability to schedule public school competition only serves to validate this two tier system, much to the detriment of the public school program.  I contend that when you remove the ability to schedule competition vs public schools the private school domination will quickly dissolve as the quality of competition will be severely limited.</p>
<p>I offer as proof the Texas HS system.  Private schools are allowed to compete only in the TAPS (Texas Association of Private Schools) division.  There is no comparison in regards competition.  Public school 5A division teams pitted against the best TAPS schools could go home at half time and still not lose the game.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HAAL Fan</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-11197</link>
		<dc:creator>HAAL Fan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 22:47:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-11197</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okay. Maybe only a few of us seem to understand. Who cares what teams are in the bracket! The teams in the bracket are just used as fillers to show the infrastructure of the bracket itself. Kyle simply used the calpreps power rankings so that he wouldn&#039;t have to sort through team after team. I&#039;m sure there&#039;d be a committee in place to carefully sort through the teams. So for god&#039;s sake argue over the fictitious playoff process not the fictitious teams in the fictitious brackets.

Moreover, if we eliminate privates from the public bracket then there can never truly be a public school champion who can absolutely declare that they are the best team in the state. It will always be &quot;We are the best public in the state.&quot; Publics beat privates all the time. But, when the private in our area has a record of over 300 wins and 20 losses in a 30 year span, it seems more lopsided of an advantage.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay. Maybe only a few of us seem to understand. Who cares what teams are in the bracket! The teams in the bracket are just used as fillers to show the infrastructure of the bracket itself. Kyle simply used the calpreps power rankings so that he wouldn&#8217;t have to sort through team after team. I&#8217;m sure there&#8217;d be a committee in place to carefully sort through the teams. So for god&#8217;s sake argue over the fictitious playoff process not the fictitious teams in the fictitious brackets.</p>
<p>Moreover, if we eliminate privates from the public bracket then there can never truly be a public school champion who can absolutely declare that they are the best team in the state. It will always be &#8220;We are the best public in the state.&#8221; Publics beat privates all the time. But, when the private in our area has a record of over 300 wins and 20 losses in a 30 year span, it seems more lopsided of an advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HSFootballFAN</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-11196</link>
		<dc:creator>HSFootballFAN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 20:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-11196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;The teams up there were strictly off the power ratings&quot;.

Kyle, your words..forget my problem with you deliberately leaving out St Vincents...YOU deliberately left off Ferndale, who happens to have rating of 16.4 over St Liz, who is -5.1.

I DO see the point you were trying to make. I know this is a suggestive model and was probably put together at the spur of the moment. I quess I&#039;m surprised at  your favortism and even more surprised at the fact that you are defending your choices.

Although...Your an East Bay writer who will ALWAYS favor the East Bay teams whether you own up to it or not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The teams up there were strictly off the power ratings&#8221;.</p>
<p>Kyle, your words..forget my problem with you deliberately leaving out St Vincents&#8230;YOU deliberately left off Ferndale, who happens to have rating of 16.4 over St Liz, who is -5.1.</p>
<p>I DO see the point you were trying to make. I know this is a suggestive model and was probably put together at the spur of the moment. I quess I&#8217;m surprised at  your favortism and even more surprised at the fact that you are defending your choices.</p>
<p>Although&#8230;Your an East Bay writer who will ALWAYS favor the East Bay teams whether you own up to it or not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BeingReal</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/2008/12/16/state-football-playoffs/comment-page-1/#comment-11195</link>
		<dc:creator>BeingReal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 18:58:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/prepcorner/?p=2622#comment-11195</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good start, let me suggest:

Drop all leagues and sections.

Private schools play on their own, not part of nor recognized by the CIF. They compete on an uneven playing field with advantages in facilities and the ablility to accept &quot;students&quot; outside of their geographical area. Especially in times like these, why should state taxpayer dollars go to support &quot;the spirit of amateur competition&quot; at the private level?

Create one statewide system based upon school size (Division) with geographical based districts in each division.  District winners compete against other district winners in a playoff format that lead to statewide divisional championship games.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good start, let me suggest:</p>
<p>Drop all leagues and sections.</p>
<p>Private schools play on their own, not part of nor recognized by the CIF. They compete on an uneven playing field with advantages in facilities and the ablility to accept &#8220;students&#8221; outside of their geographical area. Especially in times like these, why should state taxpayer dollars go to support &#8220;the spirit of amateur competition&#8221; at the private level?</p>
<p>Create one statewide system based upon school size (Division) with geographical based districts in each division.  District winners compete against other district winners in a playoff format that lead to statewide divisional championship games.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 6/19 queries in 0.007 seconds using apc
Object Caching 289/293 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2013-05-21 01:09:25 -->