6 Responses to “Chat with the Playoff Prognosticators”

1. ManO'War Says:
   November 4th, 2009 at 7:47 pm

   Interesting change to picking and seeding the playoff teams. What issue or problem do they say they are addressing by changing the format, excluding the public, etc.? Does the expansion to “possible” 16 deflect some public heat off of the selection committee?

2. football Says:
   November 4th, 2009 at 10:24 pm

   NCS is taking more teams for the $$$

   NCS rakes in the gate money at playoff games, so instead of giving 4 teams byes, they now have added 4 games to the playoffs and they will be making a few thousand at each game. Adding the extra 4 games to a couple divisions will make NCS 20,000 bucks extra if not more.

3. scholar-athlete Says:
   November 5th, 2009 at 12:15 am

   That’s load of bull!
   These schools that get the top seeds, deserve the bye week. IF they are going to add games, it should be between the lowest seeds, and earn a shot to play the next week.

4. scholar-athlete Says:
   November 5th, 2009 at 12:17 am

   P.S. Kyle, Put your money where your mouth is, This Saturday at 1 PM, Be there…

5. SamB Says:
   November 5th, 2009 at 11:51 am

   So Kyle, how do you feel today, just one day before the big game. I totally disagree with you, Cal High can and will beat MV….remember when you were in high school and we beat them at their field…same thing will happen tomorrow night….the students will storm the field. Hope you are their to see it.

6. Mike Says:
   November 6th, 2009 at 7:14 pm

   wow what does Clayton Valley losing 3 in a row say about them this year? too competitve in league.. that dval is tough who ever wins it should deserve a top 2 seed! and College Park is one game away from NCS! crazy!! they were starting off so bad..

MediaNews Group - Northern California Network