Part of the Bay Area News Group

Poll: Open or closed door meetings?

By Kyle Bonagura
Sunday, November 15th, 2009 at 8:01 pm in General.

I’ve yet to find someone who is in favor of the closed-door meetings, including several coaches. Time for a vote:


Should the NCS return to the open-meeting format?
Yes, open meetings were the way to go.

No, closed meetings are fine.

Who cares?

View Results
Free Myspace Poll

  • Share/Bookmark

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

9 Responses to “Poll: Open or closed door meetings?”

  1. the G.O.A.T. Says:

    ebal has 6 teams in and the all got home field in the first round i say again the fox is guarding the hen house i better get my dogs

  2. junior Says:

    Logan is hosting Foothill

  3. LAR Says:

    prolly best trying to hide the committee after that terrible botching of DII and DIII.

    I think there was quite a bit of support on the side of the Redwood Empire. Few eastbay teams got jewed out of spots

  4. answers Says:

    Redwood Empire got way too much respect in D-II

  5. Cash Flow Says:

    This is why CIF needs to go to a Comouter raitings system so there is no argument at all and that this terrible playoff field and seedings never happen again

  6. EBfootball Says:

    If NCS had an “open division” who would the 16 teams be?

  7. Football 4eva Says:

    Here is MaxPreps computer ranking.

    1 De La Salle
    2 Monte Vista
    3 Deer Valley
    4 Amador Valley
    5 California
    6 Foothill
    7 San Ramon Valley
    8 Pittsburg
    9 Heritage
    10 Berkeley
    11 Logan
    12 Granada
    13 Washington
    14 San Leandro
    15 College Park
    16 Antioch
    17 Newark Memorial
    18 Livermore
    19 Freedom
    20 American
    21 Liberty
    22 Santa Rosa
    23 Castro Valley
    24 Arroyo
    25 Irvington

  8. HS Football Fan Says:

    Somebody pointed this out to me today…

    Before last season, the playoffs for Divisions 2 and 3 were broken up into separate brackets for the Redwood Empire and the East Bay. So the NCS was used to the prospects of roughly equal numbers of teams getting into the playoffs from both regions. Last season was the first time that these designations weren’t used, and yet Division II had exactly 6 East Bay teams and exactly 6 Redwood Empire teams. Division III didn’t have enough teams qualified.

    This year there were more than enough teams qualified, even with the expanded brackets, and yet look at what happened. In Division II, there are exactly 8 East Bay teams and exactly 8 Redwood Empire teams. San Lorenzo was left out with a 6-4 record, and clearly the last two teams to get in were Redwood Empire teams with less deserving records. In Division III, it seemed pretty clear that both Moreau Catholic and Kennedy were more deserving than either Terra Linda or Sonoma Valley, but by filling the brackets the way they did, amazingly there are exactly 8 East Bay and exactly 8 Redwood Empire teams.

    That really can’t be a coincidence…

  9. ebal1 Says:

    Interesting with all of the arguing going on over who got screwed etc…. MaxPrep has 6 EBAL team in the Top 7. That would make things even worse than the NCS crew came up with.

Leave a Reply