Comments on: LIVE BLOG: East Bay prep football updates tonight, 6:45

By: Scl alum

Scl alum — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 22:08:06 +0000

It sucks, I’ve been a longtime Cal fan (well before Tedford), and I greatly appreciate the program turnaround in recent years under his being at the helm. That being said, ever since last season, the Bears have been such a roller coaster, or more a pro pos, ‘jeckyll and hyde’team. I think that Tedford has already peaked at Cal, and a change at the top is Cal’s best hope of being vying for the Pac 10 title again. Go Bears

By: c.sparks

c.sparks — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:20:46 +0000

EXACTLY!!!! post #26… i mean come on they can be a HARD HITTING TEAM againest teams like UC davis and ARIZONA STAte, but when the big dogs like USC comes they fold like some girls… Cal is scared of USC.. they try to have there program runed like a pro style offense just like usc, but theres one problem with that.. SO does stanford and they have better coaches.. so does usc and they have better coaches and athletes so why in the world would a good Prospect pick a school like cal, there games are never sold out, bad facilty and NOT a football school…. so u are not gonna get the best players in the state..PLUS tedford lets these bay area kids that WANT TO GO TO CAL! go to schools like WSU BOISE< OREGON, OREGON STATE, and all they yap about is how there state is better then our state in football, but using our ATHLETHES. FIRE TEDFORD!!! we weill always be in the middle of the pack…

By: football phenatik

football phenatik — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 21:09:32 +0000

WSU will beat Cal….but it’s sucks that they won’t have Galvin to help them do it. He will be back next year more bigger,more explosive, and a bigger threat!

Run Rickey Run

By: Footballfan415

Footballfan415 — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 18:21:24 +0000

Cal is a bunch of pussies starting w/their coach…..they have never comeback after being punched in the mouth early, they just roll over and play dead the second any adversity comes their way…….WSU is going to beat their ass at Pullamn

By: Scl alum

Scl alum — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 16:13:49 +0000

It really stinks, I’m a big Cal fan, but seems like it’s the Pac 4 conference the rest of this season..

By: KillerD

KillerD — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:50:44 +0000

Kind of like comparing the EBAL to the rest of the conference high school schedules in the east bay, their league is the best top to bottom.

By: KillerD

KillerD — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:49:47 +0000

Renegades10: You are correct and my mistake for uttering Terrible about the Pac 10 this year.

I would call the Pac10 respectable for the top 4 teams.

But playing their conference schedule does not compare to SEC weekly grind, might be better way to say it.

By: renegades10

renegades10 — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:59:42 +0000

disagree big time with the statement that the Pac-10 is terrible this year. Between Oregon, Stanford, Arizona, Oregon State, and USC that group is solid. It’s just that the difference between the top 5 and bottom 5 is pretty large. USC should have beaten Washington and to be honest should have beaten Stanford as well, although I am happy they didn’t as I’m a huge cardinal fan. But those top 5 teams are all listed in the top 25 in at least one of the polls I believe, although not quite as sure about the Beavers, but the other four are. So while not great like some past years, it’s pretty solid, not terrible though that’s for sure. When half the teams are in the top 25, I don’t think you could ever say the conference is terrible.

By: EB Football Coach

EB Football Coach — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 04:58:07 +0000

Joe – I probably won’t see the film because I won’t need to, but the paper’s write-up said Pittsburg scored on six of their nine posessions. Doesn’t sound like they had much chance on either side of the ball. Not too many teams are going to put up six/seven scores on pitt.

By: HARRY CALLAHAN

HARRY CALLAHAN — Sun, 31 Oct 2010 03:45:18 +0000

1. BOISE
2. ORY-GUN
3. AUBURN
4. BAMA
5. Stanford