The myth of packing it in
With the Raiders playing out the string at 4-9, the annual tank watch is underway.
It’s understandable given the totality of a 38-7 loss to the Green Bay Packers at Lambeau Field, one which got away so completely coach Lane Kiffin admitted afterward to running the ball late in the game to make sure things didn’t get worse.
Packing it in is one of the easiest things to allege and the hardest to prove. My long-held belief is that players don’t often quit, with the only clear instance of a Roberto Duran “No Mas” coming from Randy Moss, who often gave little or no effort because he was unhappy and wanted out.
Otherwise, these are paid professionals who want to keep drawing paychecks. Disorganization, low morale and inferior talent may contribute to the apperance of outright tanking when it doesn’t truly exist.
A team with less urgency hasn’t necessarily quit so much as it sometimes succumbed to the inevitable.
Warren Sapp opened some eyes last week when he told Packers beat writers by conference call that it’s different in Oakland because he’s “not playing for championships” any more, but it doesn’t mean Sapp has quit or succumbed. There were times against Green Bay he appeared to be expending more energy than anyone else up front.
The Raiders went far too quietly against the Packers for anyone’s comfort, and it will be interesting to see if Kiffin can field a team which will generate enough enthusiasm and precision to hang with the defending Super Bowl champion Indianapolis Colts.
I had casual conversations with a few players who are usually pretty good about honestly assessing how they feel the team is doing so long as I don’t quote them, and got the feeling they really thought they were going to play well against the Colts.
I reserve the right to be skeptical, particularly because it’s hard to envision the Colts not tearing through the Raiders for 500-plus yards and racking up first downs with Peyton Manning flooding the field with passes everywhere but around Nnamdi Asomugha and Joseph Addai running at will.
But the possibility exists the Raiders could get some things done on the ground against a smallish Colts defense which has already lost Dwight Freeney and Anthony McFarland and now will play without Robert Mathis up front.
The Colts play very well together defensively but are stretched to the limit in terms of depth. The more long, clock-eating drives the Raiders can manage, the more Manning and Co. are cooling their heels on the sideline.
Dungy’s lone appearance in Oakland, which happened 13 games into the season, just like this one, provides the best blueprint for going after a smaller, Tampa 2 defense.
On Dec. 19, 1999, the Tampa Bay Buccaneers came to to town with a 9-4 record and the NFL’s second-ranked defense en route to a division title. The Raiders were 6-7.
Incredibly, the Raiders beat the Bucs 45-0, rushing for 262 yards as Tyrone Wheatley had 111 yards on 19 carries and Napoleon Kaufman 122 yards on eight attempts.
“Tampa’s not very big,” coach Jon Gruden said that day., “We tried to run downhill at them.”
The Raiders don’t have the kind of offensive talent they had in 1999, when they were a year away from a 12-4 record, but for that matter, the Colts aren’t anywhere near the defense Tampa was at the time, either.
It won’t be 45-0, but if the Raiders play as well as they did two weeks ago against Denver and don’t repeat their Lambeau belly flop, it can be competitive.
Toys for Tots
– Want to feel good about the game regardless of the score? Bring an unwrapped toy, valued at $20 or more, for the annual Toys for Tots drive for underprividged children.
Members of the U.S. Marine Corps reserve will be stationed at the West Side Plaza, as well as Gates A, B, C and D before and after the game.
Posted on Saturday, December 15th, 2007
Under: Coaching Search, Oakland Raiders | 94 Comments »

