IS DAVID BECKHAM KING MIDAS?
By Robert Evans
Thursday, January 18th, 2007 at 9:54 am in General.
I thought that after a few days, the hype about David Beckham and the effect he is going to have on soccer here would die down, except of course, in those media outlets where ignorance about the world’s greatest game reigns supreme. Everybody wants to write something about Beckham, even if they don’t don’t know the first thing about the sport.
But no, the outpouring of verbiage continues. Newspaper columns keep coming, intercontinental phone hook-ups produce the player’s comments, old clips of Beckham’s free kicks are shown over and over, and reporters follow his wife as she goes house-hunting in L.A. Will Becks and Posh join Tom Cruise and his wife in the weirdness of Scientology? On and on it goes, and only occasionally is it about the game and Beckham’s skills.
Let me try to introduce some sanity into the discussion. Beckham is not like the King Midas of mythology; he will not turn everything he touches into gold for the game. No, I don’t think that five years of David Beckham will upgrade Major League Soccer into the ranks of competitions like the Premiership, Serie A, La Liga or the Bundesliga. Yes, I do believe that attendance will go up–at least for a year or two–wherever he plays. And his marketing image will sell thousands of shirts and other paraphernalia. That alone will be good for Major League Soccer and U.S. Soccer, but it will not be a permanent fix. Here’s why.
David Beckham or any other world-class player will provide only a temporary improvement in the game. The overall product week in, week out will be the same. Yet it is the overall product that attracts a permanent audience, and that will change only over years of progress. I am sure that players around the world have made a note of the money that Beckham is going to make here, and I am equally sure that other clubs in MLS may try to find funds to hire some top-class names, now that the “Beckham rule” is available for breaching the salary cap.
But let’s assume that a dozen other great players come here. Does that automatically improve the quality of players being drafted out of college? These are the future of the league, and even if they are good enough to play in Europe, learning the necessary professional skills, it will be years before we see the teams in MLS benefiting from players’ development. Individual great players are only a temporary solution to what ails MLS. We saw many, many great players in the North American Soccer League, and they weren’t enough to keep the league alive.
Having said all that, and having brought some pessimism into the discussion, I can also say that I am going to enjoy watching him play. He’s got a good coach who has played at the highest level, he has some talent around him, and he’s always been a team player. David Beckham will be good to watch, just as Pele, Cruyff, Best, Moore, Beckenbauer and all the others were good to watch….while they were here.
Tomorrow, I’ll write about what to look for when Beckham steps on the field. In the meantime, go to the LA Times for the results of a poll on the effect that Becks will have.
[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]



January 23rd, 2007 at 4:57 pm
Obviously, DBeck is coming to America to be the next James Bond, and he is a natural and won’t have to fake the accent… He is following in Arnold’s footsteps. Elay is for moviestars.
But what about the new blood on the MNT!! We are again ready to take on the best of Europe, Africa, S. America, wherever. You are scared of the US, Robert, and rightly so.
April 27th, 2007 at 8:13 am
It says something about the writer to identify individual players as the reason for gaining enjoyment from the game.
Greats are inspirational not just for their technical ball-skills, but for their personal roles in a coalescent unit which enabled them to rise above the winning teams they were a part of (societal lessons for anyone?).
Mental strength, leadership ability, spatial awareness, consistency, resiliance, fortitude, game/season/tournament/media management, bounce-back-ability, temperament…the list is endless, but all are of at least equal importance to crowd-pleasing as a test of the person to the skills or stats of any player.
Beckham is a good player, but as a man he sets a new gold-standard for the current media age, epitomized by his behavior during any of the tribulations of his career.
Don’t be jealous of the money, the sum of the contribution is and will continue to be immeasurable - what is all this talk drawing attention to after all??