Part of the Bay Area News Group

`I’d like to thank my agent, my congestion management agency…’

By enelson
Friday, March 2nd, 2007 at 8:04 pm in Caltrans, driving, Freeways, Funding.


After hibernating much of Thursday, I can now think more clearly about what happened Wednesday, and what didn’t.

One thing I have an oddly unjournalistic sense of guilt over is how easily I ignored the flood of press releases that came out after the California Transportation Commission banged the gavel on $4.5 billion worth of Proposition 1B highway money.

Whenever government gives birth to anything that a lot of people like, proud parents seem to come popping out of the woodwork waving cigars.

I know a lot of readers of this blog aren’t all that impressed with so much money going into pavement, but face it, people in this country, this state, this Bay Area — they drive to work for the most part. The good news is that at some point, your neighborhood transit agency will be getting its share of a $3.6 billion public transportation bond, plus more money for security upgrades.

The aftermath of the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account allocation was something like the podium at the Oscars, except much of the acceptance releases were self-congratulatory: “Most of all, I’d like to thank myself for all of my hard work that brought home the bacon to my county and my district.”

OK, so nobody really said that and it’s not fair of me to, either, because, in the Bay Area in particular, there was a lot of well-deserved credit to take.

In a nutshell: We kicked ass up and down the state. The Bay Area was staring down $700 million and ended up with $1.29 billion. That’s more than Los Angeles County’s 10 million inhabitants got for their not-so-insignificant traffic issues.

It didn’t hurt that Bay Area officials, with a little help from the media (I won’t tell if you don’t), managed to vilify a certain bypass project in Mendocino County that the commission’s staff had recommended for $177 million. The commission killed that idea, and put that money into a carpool lane on I-580 from Livermore to Dublin and a project to open up the Novato Narrows connecting Marin and Sonoma counties.

Those projects were left off a pumped-up list put out by the commission’s staff after hearing outrage from LA, the Bay Area and San Diego over projects left off of their first list, which deferred $1.7 billion for a second round of funding. That last bit could be interpreted as a shrewd maneuver to allow the unfunded to rant about which projects they absolutely must have (The 405 in LA, for instance) and then spend the whole wad to make everyone happy.

The other theory is that the CTC staff simply miscalculated how wrong they could be, politically speaking. When it was clear that somebody had to come up with a plan, there was one agency that had a bigger staff with more expertise and information at their fingertips that CTC members could turn to: The Metropolitan Transportation Commission.

That agency is the butt of many jokes for being a massive, bloated bureaucracy, and I may have make a few wisecracks about the sheer number of spokespeople who work there (they’ve got nothing on Caltrans, however), but those resources seemed to have paid off at this critical moment in history.

It probably didn’t hurt that the President Pro Tempore of the State Senate, Don Perata, hails from Oakland. One project starting in Oakland, a southbound carpool lane  on I-80 from Hegenburger Road to Marina Boulevard in San Leandro, was left off the initial CTC staff list. While Perata didn’t make a public fuss as did his Assembly counterpart, Fabian Núñez, he was no doubt working things out in his own quiet way.

Perata’s was one of the releases I received Wednesday, and in retrospect, I have to appreciate its simplicity — a mere two paragraphs on the biggest infusion of highway money since the 1960s:

I praise the California Transportation Commission for its thoughtful work. The $4.5 billion for vital transportation projects is a victory for commuters throughout the state. In the Bay Area, $1.29 billion will go toward transportation needs that will greatly improve our region’s commute corridors.

This action is a tremendous first step in getting bond money out the door to where it is needed most. This is only the beginning and we still must make sure money for ports, levees and housing is put to use quickly and with tangible results.

I also got a somewhat longer release from the Alameda County Congestion Management Agency, which, along with the Alameda County Transportation Improvement Authority had been plugging away on several of these projects for years before Sacramento got its act together and passed the Mother of All Bonds.

In this case, it’s probably not a stretch to say, as executive director Dennis Fay did in the release, that the win in Irvine was “a great effort by our elected officials, business organizations and community leaders.”

There were others, some from involved parties and some from people who showed up at the appropriate moments, but all those voices added to the pressure that brought legislative leaders, the governor and finally, the commissioners into the Bay Area’s court.

Now give it five or 10 years, and you might see some actual projects get done.


Photo of Caldecott Tunnel’s first three bores from

[You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.]

One Response to “`I’d like to thank my agent, my congestion management agency…’”

  1. david vartanoff Says:

    Sadly, these various misguided highway expansions will achieve very short term congestion relief. As we all saw the dotbomb bust gave us a brief period of more fluid traffic in the South Bay. The basic land use mistakes were not reversed, and now traffic is as bad as ever. Building more capacity for greater distance commutes to low rise offices cannot ever succeed. The acreage simply isn’t there for massive increases in single occupancy cars even if they are green painted hybrids. Most particularly building a fourth bore to encourage reverse commutes while the BART trains in reverse direction are sparsely used is moneywasted.

Leave a Reply