<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: the government is here to help</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/</link>
	<description>Getting around the Bay Area with Denis Cuff and the Queen of the Road</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 06:04:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Span</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/comment-page-1/#comment-2475</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Span</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/#comment-2475</guid>
		<description>Oops.  It dropped the cut and paste:

&quot;Peters stressed that creation of a federal-state funding partnership was specifically called for by the Bush Administration as part of its long standing intercity passenger rail reform effort.&quot;

Here&#039;s the link:

http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/press-releases/173</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops.  It dropped the cut and paste:</p>
<p>&#8220;Peters stressed that creation of a federal-state funding partnership was specifically called for by the Bush Administration as part of its long standing intercity passenger rail reform effort.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s the link:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/press-releases/173" rel="nofollow">http://www.fra.dot.gov/us/press-releases/173</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Span</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/comment-page-1/#comment-2476</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Span</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 09:47:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/#comment-2476</guid>
		<description>God&#039;s teeth!  The Government is here to help you.  Here&#039;s a link to an older story of how the president wanted to help.  This was his previous plan for Amtrak:

http://www.baycrossings.com/dispnews.asp?id=515

This is a cut and paste from the current FRA press release:



Sounds nice.  Has anyone bothered to look at the details of the &quot;Intercity Passenger Rail Reform?&quot;  It should properly be titled the Passenger Rail Elimination Act.  I remain amazed that this administration can sugar-coat cow pies and people (sorry Erik) line up to swallow them.

Take a close look at this and decide if you prefer humble pie or cow pie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>God&#8217;s teeth!  The Government is here to help you.  Here&#8217;s a link to an older story of how the president wanted to help.  This was his previous plan for Amtrak:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.baycrossings.com/dispnews.asp?id=515" rel="nofollow">http://www.baycrossings.com/dispnews.asp?id=515</a></p>
<p>This is a cut and paste from the current FRA press release:</p>
<p>Sounds nice.  Has anyone bothered to look at the details of the &#8220;Intercity Passenger Rail Reform?&#8221;  It should properly be titled the Passenger Rail Elimination Act.  I remain amazed that this administration can sugar-coat cow pies and people (sorry Erik) line up to swallow them.</p>
<p>Take a close look at this and decide if you prefer humble pie or cow pie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the government deserves more credit - The Capricious Commuter - Getting around the Bay Area with Erik N. Nelson</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/comment-page-1/#comment-2473</link>
		<dc:creator>the government deserves more credit - The Capricious Commuter - Getting around the Bay Area with Erik N. Nelson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/#comment-2473</guid>
		<description>[...] the government is here to help [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the government is here to help [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/comment-page-1/#comment-2474</link>
		<dc:creator>e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 01:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/#comment-2474</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to echo what Mike said. I don&#039;t think you need to &quot;disclaim [that you&#039;re] a beneficiary of the 50 percent taxpayer subsidy for the Capitol Corridor&quot;.

Does an automobile driver ever disclaim that they&#039;re a beneficiary of the 100% taxpayer subsidy when they&#039;re driving on local roads? They just assume that everyone is happy to pay for the traffic cops, street repair crews, and hospitals so that we can have many lanes of traffic streaming around our towns.

Personally I&#039;d rather see my tax dollars spent on safer, more space &amp; fuel efficient transit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to echo what Mike said. I don&#8217;t think you need to &#8220;disclaim [that you're] a beneficiary of the 50 percent taxpayer subsidy for the Capitol Corridor&#8221;.</p>
<p>Does an automobile driver ever disclaim that they&#8217;re a beneficiary of the 100% taxpayer subsidy when they&#8217;re driving on local roads? They just assume that everyone is happy to pay for the traffic cops, street repair crews, and hospitals so that we can have many lanes of traffic streaming around our towns.</p>
<p>Personally I&#8217;d rather see my tax dollars spent on safer, more space &amp; fuel efficient transit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/comment-page-1/#comment-2472</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 05:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/transportation/2008/02/22/the-government-is-here-to-help/#comment-2472</guid>
		<description>First, I appreciate this blog. It&#039;s nice to hear the things that don&#039;t make it into the printed articles and your opinions on the subject of transportation.

Caltrain (also operated under a contract with Amtrak) &quot;reinvented&quot; itself mid-decade and the results have been a success. Make it possible for the train to be competitive with the car and people will ride. I took a 4:33pm baby bullet on Wednesday, and it was busy the entire length of the route.  People who exited at the mid-Peninsula stations were replaced with new riders going to San Jose.  Caltrain says that are taking in more revenue under this operating pattern, because people can ride longer distances (which cost more) in less time.

I realize that public transportation is subsidized, but do consider that those who use transit are frequently doing so to earn wages, which are taxed. In some sense we are just reaping some benefit from our tax payments.  I rode Caltrain for nearly 3 years before taking a job where I work exclusively at home.

Finally, roads are certainly heavily subsidized...gas taxes and fees do not come close to covering the cost of construction and maintenance.

I&#039;m with you--give me a train, a laptop with something to read or watch and I&#039;m a happy commuter. The rest of you can enjoy the traffic jams and accidents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First, I appreciate this blog. It&#8217;s nice to hear the things that don&#8217;t make it into the printed articles and your opinions on the subject of transportation.</p>
<p>Caltrain (also operated under a contract with Amtrak) &#8220;reinvented&#8221; itself mid-decade and the results have been a success. Make it possible for the train to be competitive with the car and people will ride. I took a 4:33pm baby bullet on Wednesday, and it was busy the entire length of the route.  People who exited at the mid-Peninsula stations were replaced with new riders going to San Jose.  Caltrain says that are taking in more revenue under this operating pattern, because people can ride longer distances (which cost more) in less time.</p>
<p>I realize that public transportation is subsidized, but do consider that those who use transit are frequently doing so to earn wages, which are taxed. In some sense we are just reaping some benefit from our tax payments.  I rode Caltrain for nearly 3 years before taking a job where I work exclusively at home.</p>
<p>Finally, roads are certainly heavily subsidized&#8230;gas taxes and fees do not come close to covering the cost of construction and maintenance.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m with you&#8211;give me a train, a laptop with something to read or watch and I&#8217;m a happy commuter. The rest of you can enjoy the traffic jams and accidents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 3/19 queries in 0.009 seconds using apc
Object Caching 249/266 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2012-02-10 05:28:14 -->
