<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Newark officially seeking utility tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 04:27:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marty</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6921</link>
		<dc:creator>Marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 16:37:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6921</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[“The city is going to lose a lot of good people because of this,”

Why not  just pay them less?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The city is going to lose a lot of good people because of this,”</p>
<p>Why not  just pay them less?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6925</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2009 04:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There will be a &quot;recounting&quot; of the Measure L votes on Monday at the Registrar&#039;s Office in Oakland.  It&#039;s as it should be with such a close election.  Thanks to Ben Aguirre for keeping us all up to date on this issue.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be a &#8220;recounting&#8221; of the Measure L votes on Monday at the Registrar&#8217;s Office in Oakland.  It&#8217;s as it should be with such a close election.  Thanks to Ben Aguirre for keeping us all up to date on this issue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbox231</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6924</link>
		<dc:creator>bbox231</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:42:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6924</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_13722601?source=rss




Newark&#039;s Measure L utility tax defeated by 10 votes
By Ben Aguirre Jr.
Oakland Tribune
Posted: 11/05/2009 03:52:52 PM PST
Updated: 11/05/2009 03:52:52 PM PST


NEWARK — Measure L, the city&#039;s proposed utility users tax, has been defeated by 10 votes.

The tally released this afternoon shows that 2,354 residents voted for the measure, but another 2,364 voted against the tax, which would have added a 3.9 percent charge to almost all utility bills in the city.

All the ballots have been counted, but the election will not be certified until later this month, after officials conduct a normal 1 percent audit of all ballots, said Guy Ashley, a spokesman for the Alameda County Registrar of Voters.

City Councilman Alan Nagy, who was re-elected on Tuesday, said the result of measure&#039;s rejection by voters will be a loss of jobs.

&quot;The city is going to lose a lot of good people because of this,&quot; he said. &quot;It&#039;s really sad.&quot;

Dean Lewis, a member of the group opposing the measure, was nearly speechless when he saw the results.

&quot;It&#039;s very apparent the city is divided on this; it&#039;s really incredible,&quot; Lewis said.

Lewis and Nagy both said close races like these show the importance of every vote.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_13722601?source=rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidebayarea.com/oaklandtribune/localnews/ci_13722601?source=rss</a></p>
<p>Newark&#8217;s Measure L utility tax defeated by 10 votes<br />
By Ben Aguirre Jr.<br />
Oakland Tribune<br />
Posted: 11/05/2009 03:52:52 PM PST<br />
Updated: 11/05/2009 03:52:52 PM PST</p>
<p>NEWARK — Measure L, the city&#8217;s proposed utility users tax, has been defeated by 10 votes.</p>
<p>The tally released this afternoon shows that 2,354 residents voted for the measure, but another 2,364 voted against the tax, which would have added a 3.9 percent charge to almost all utility bills in the city.</p>
<p>All the ballots have been counted, but the election will not be certified until later this month, after officials conduct a normal 1 percent audit of all ballots, said Guy Ashley, a spokesman for the Alameda County Registrar of Voters.</p>
<p>City Councilman Alan Nagy, who was re-elected on Tuesday, said the result of measure&#8217;s rejection by voters will be a loss of jobs.</p>
<p>&#8220;The city is going to lose a lot of good people because of this,&#8221; he said. &#8220;It&#8217;s really sad.&#8221;</p>
<p>Dean Lewis, a member of the group opposing the measure, was nearly speechless when he saw the results.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s very apparent the city is divided on this; it&#8217;s really incredible,&#8221; Lewis said.</p>
<p>Lewis and Nagy both said close races like these show the importance of every vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gus Morrison</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6923</link>
		<dc:creator>Gus Morrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 23:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of now, no leads by 8 votes.  I am told by a Newark staff member that there are somewhere around 450 uncounted absentee votes and 50-70 other uncounted votes, probably provisionals from polling places.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As of now, no leads by 8 votes.  I am told by a Newark staff member that there are somewhere around 450 uncounted absentee votes and 50-70 other uncounted votes, probably provisionals from polling places.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bbox231</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6922</link>
		<dc:creator>bbox231</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Nov 2009 22:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6922</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.insidebayarea.com/argus/localnews/ci_13708367?source=rss



And - for the date on which BANG ceases hosting the above link, here&#039;s the text of the article - - -

Newark Measure L: Utility users tax loses by slim margin
Oakland Tribune
Posted: 11/03/2009 09:46:44 PM PST
Updated: 11/03/2009 11:58:04 PM PST

Newark city leaders placed on the ballot a 3.9 percent utility users tax to be affixed to almost all utility bills for six years. Officials estimated the tax would have generated $2.5 million annually. A simple majority was needed for the measure to pass and the tax to be collected beginning in January.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.insidebayarea.com/argus/localnews/ci_13708367?source=rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.insidebayarea.com/argus/localnews/ci_13708367?source=rss</a></p>
<p>And &#8211; for the date on which BANG ceases hosting the above link, here&#8217;s the text of the article &#8211; - -</p>
<p>Newark Measure L: Utility users tax loses by slim margin<br />
Oakland Tribune<br />
Posted: 11/03/2009 09:46:44 PM PST<br />
Updated: 11/03/2009 11:58:04 PM PST</p>
<p>Newark city leaders placed on the ballot a 3.9 percent utility users tax to be affixed to almost all utility bills for six years. Officials estimated the tax would have generated $2.5 million annually. A simple majority was needed for the measure to pass and the tax to be collected beginning in January.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6920</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arguments and rebuttal have been submitted.  Please see our web site.

http://home.earthlink.net/~lewis2/vote.nonewarktax/]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arguments and rebuttal have been submitted.  Please see our web site.</p>
<p><a href="http://home.earthlink.net/~lewis2/vote.nonewarktax/" rel="nofollow">http://home.earthlink.net/~lewis2/vote.nonewarktax/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Margaret</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6919</link>
		<dc:creator>Margaret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 02:39:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6919</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For more information send an email to nonewarktax@yahoo.com]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For more information send an email to <a href="mailto:nonewarktax@yahoo.com">nonewarktax@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e-citizen</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6918</link>
		<dc:creator>e-citizen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a new Wednesday August 5th City Council Meeting tomorrow to discuss making changes to the already approved Utility Tax proposal.  Looks like they are planning to make the tax 6 years vs 20 years.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a new Wednesday August 5th City Council Meeting tomorrow to discuss making changes to the already approved Utility Tax proposal.  Looks like they are planning to make the tax 6 years vs 20 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6917</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 00:15:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6917</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several years ago, when Newark formed citizens committees to work on updating the general plan, called Project 2007, we tried to get areas of the city zoned and planned for housing.   One area is the large parcel of land where Ohlone College now sits and the vacant land to the south.  The owner, John Sobrato wanted it zoned for residential and so did the citizens committees.  But no, Mayor Dave insisted on it being zoned for high tech as he felt sure that Silicone Valley &quot;North&quot; was going to happen in Newark.  It never did and today, he will not re-zone the land until Mr. Sobrato provides a golf course in that very wetland mentioned above.  Who wants to live on the other side of the railroad tracks out where the wrecking yards are and in the area to the south.  I wouldn&#039;t purchase a McMansion out there with such a magnificent view of the Durham Land Fill..   Would you?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several years ago, when Newark formed citizens committees to work on updating the general plan, called Project 2007, we tried to get areas of the city zoned and planned for housing.   One area is the large parcel of land where Ohlone College now sits and the vacant land to the south.  The owner, John Sobrato wanted it zoned for residential and so did the citizens committees.  But no, Mayor Dave insisted on it being zoned for high tech as he felt sure that Silicone Valley &#8220;North&#8221; was going to happen in Newark.  It never did and today, he will not re-zone the land until Mr. Sobrato provides a golf course in that very wetland mentioned above.  Who wants to live on the other side of the railroad tracks out where the wrecking yards are and in the area to the south.  I wouldn&#8217;t purchase a McMansion out there with such a magnificent view of the Durham Land Fill..   Would you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Coyote_Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/2009/07/24/newark-officially-seeking-utility-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-6916</link>
		<dc:creator>Coyote_Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jul 2009 20:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ibabuzz.com/tricitybeat/?p=3994#comment-6916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, Mayor Dave is a avid golfer. He wants to turn wetlands and wild life habitat at the end of Stevenson into a Golf Course and McMansions.
He needs more money to make this happen, so.....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, Mayor Dave is a avid golfer. He wants to turn wetlands and wild life habitat at the end of Stevenson into a Golf Course and McMansions.<br />
He needs more money to make this happen, so&#8230;..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using apc
Page Caching using apc
Database Caching 6/19 queries in 0.005 seconds using apc
Object Caching 284/288 objects using apc

Served from: www.ibabuzz.com @ 2013-06-19 19:21:36 -->