Comments on: District Attorney opens investigation into Nardolillo

By: Justwatching

Justwatching — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 16:48:09 +0000

After reading todays article, it seems several folks new about this issue but decided to not pursue any investigation. A twist on the City of Bell’s ethics. All involved in what appears to have taken choice to look the other way should be investigated.

I guess they will say they didn’t knowingly turn away from a possible issue regarding a board members residency.

By: Audrey

Audrey — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:51:58 +0000

This is terrible! I have to agree with Dean’s comments. Sounds like the board is just sliding the issue under the rug. I feel like I was lied to, I mean I went to Ohlone for a semester in 2006. Wow I’m shocked

By: Dean

Dean — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 15:07:05 +0000

The front page report in the 3/31 issue of the Argus is a bunch of “BS”. The Board President should have called a meeting and requested his resignation. But no, the “good old boy” network strikes again. They have known for years he doesn’t live in Fremont. Having a homeowner’s exemption on his place in Livermore is proof that he lives there. You have to state that this is your principle residence to receive one from the county.

By: Moe

Moe — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 05:03:00 +0000

It’s very disappointing that this action took so many years. Everyone had suspicions but did nothing.

By: Robert

Robert — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 04:32:38 +0000

Interesting..let’s see how it develops.

By: Cindy

Cindy — Thu, 31 Mar 2011 00:19:50 +0000

It was interesting – I went to the DA’s office at the Fremont Justice Center yesterday to file a complaint but they said I would have to file a complaint with the Police Department and the police would file the complaint. So I was going to call the FPPC today but saw your post first – well done them!!!