Comments on: Allen Iverson for Jason Richardson?

By: Channing

Channing — Mon, 11 Dec 2006 14:46:00 +0000

I would make the deal for any other Warrior except Richardson. If Richardson could make his free throws he’d be among the leaders in scoring.

Richardson is younger than Iverson, makes less money, and is more of a team player and has a better work ethic. People forget with Iverson you have to contend with the “I don’t need to practice” attitude which doesn’t help your team.

Chan

By: MC

MC — Mon, 11 Dec 2006 11:55:30 +0000

Stephen Jackson, Tinsley, Foster to Sixers.

Murphy (ND grad), Dunlevey, Cabarkaba (sorry for the spelling) to Indiana.

Iverson to the W’s

Would the Pacers do this is the question.

By: Andrew Rosenblum

Andrew Rosenblum — Sun, 10 Dec 2006 14:38:34 +0000

I wouldn’t do it either. I just don’t see how Baron and AI fit well together, particularly if you have Monta and Pietrus already (and even Dunleavy as a ballhandler). James’ Steph and Steven comparison is apt. What the Warriors really need is a power forward who can play decent defense and rebound. Murphy is supposed to be that guy, but he can’t guard anyone. Ike is a good offensive player at the 4, but doesn’t seem very strong defensively either.

By: James

James — Sat, 09 Dec 2006 23:44:25 +0000

No way. Just look at what happened to the Steph and Steve show in NY.