Comments on: Warriors Coach Mark Jackson’s Job is Safe … OK, Not Exactly Breaking News

By: Ewok

Ewok — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 23:24:25 +0000

Mark Jackson is no clown.

The problem of this team is still predicated on the front office. Having said that, i am not saying the front office we have now is incompetent. But it’s much better to realize now that we finally have a front office that is willing to address the problems of this team, that is willing to spend more for the sake of winning, and is more than willing to facilitate a positive change in the right direction.

The Fans provide their support and their role is certainly essential. But! There are Fans who know nothing but criticize despite limited knowledge in Basketball.

By: Ron

Ron — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:47:14 +0000

Pluses for Jackson. The team has played hard every night (except last night) and has put a better effort forward on defense. Minuses. Small ball insistance. Just a recipe for losing. Insistance on starting Biedrens for so long. Maybe on orders from above? End of game strategy in close games. I think his weakest area. Just seems helter skelter with last play strategy alway’s being someone going one on one. Shouldn’t a prepared coach have a few end of game plays in his pocket?

By: Trapped in Golden State

Trapped in Golden State — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 15:05:16 +0000

How about after last night? still totally secure? I’m pretty sure PJ, Brian Winters, Dave Cowens, Musselman, the Geiko lizard, the E trade baby or that dancing squirrel on you tube could have coached us to a 40 point loss! trappedingoldenstate.com

By: Mick

Mick — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 12:08:12 +0000

Eric Spoelstra is not a great coach. He coaches great players. I’d go for Nate Mccmillian. A stoic with past success.

By: Ned

Ned — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 11:01:35 +0000

Mark Jackson came into training camp a week after a lockout agreement was settled and without and did not knotime to run practice on defensive schemes

By: robert rowell

robert rowell — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 08:08:28 +0000

Let me get this straight – a winning coach only does so because he’s got talent, not for anything the coach has done, but yet Jackson is a better coach (than svg or spolestra) because he DOESN’T have talent and is losing? Sounds like Larry Riley logic to me. Give me ‘scrub’ coaches who win any day over this no excuses clown we have now.

By: Ewok

Ewok — Tue, 10 Apr 2012 06:26:55 +0000

It’s obvious Mark Jackson has improved the little details and he has done well but it is a bit too soon and unfair to expect W’s at this point especially if you lose two elite players in the middle of the season for a player who is still in sickbay. Jackson has established the right work ethic, the right approach, the right chemistry and the right common goal of winning.

Let him get his pieces… Let him execute his philosophy and great things will surely happen… What we need to get in the draft is a bigtime player, (Perhaps Drummond) in the front court or (Harrison Barnes)as a swing, and a good back up big 4-5 athletic biggie and not a stiffie.

Once you get the elements, we have a team to move on with.

By: Stan

Stan — Mon, 09 Apr 2012 20:14:17 +0000

A rookie owner who hires a rookie coach and a rookie half manager-Meyers- adds up to a lot of learning curve. And when you keep the builder GM of small ball in Larry Riley, its no wonder so many big trades fell through.
If next year is win one,lose one,this franchise is going to have to clean house in the FO.

By: Trapped in Golden State

Trapped in Golden State — Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:51:20 +0000

#9 I’m definitely not one of those…winning the skills challenge at all star weekend doesn’t make you a superstar…lol

By: moreaufan2

moreaufan2 — Mon, 09 Apr 2012 15:50:53 +0000

Yeah we arent doing any better than we did last season, dorell wright not playing well. and we actually have more weapons then last year. Keith Smart did a better job to me, the teams we beat this year that are good, we beat those same teams last year and others! We need to make team uncomfortable when we play defense in my opinion, we never trap or press at all just to give a different look, and zone wise we only play 2-3 never anything else to make the other team make big adjustments.