Comments on: A Familiar Name Might Be a Perfect Fit For Warriors

By: AQ

AQ — Thu, 12 Jul 2012 03:21:39 +0000

I don’t think Watson even knows how to spell DEFENSE!!!!!

By: manhttanproj

manhttanproj — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:43:35 +0000

one way or another, they need to resolve the brandon rush contract situation. otherwise they won’t know how much they can spend on FAs.

bayless for $3M a year would have been a good and cheap option. but w’s can’t decide whether to spend that kind of money knowing a team can offer rush $6M per and can’t match.

rush contract will really slow things down

By: DubsFan

DubsFan — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:25:46 +0000

No point in thinking about this anymore. The Warriors are getting Jarrett Jack now for Dorrell Wright.

By: cadan

cadan — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:20:14 +0000

he put up 20 and 9 in one game and a triple double in the other against the warriors this year

By: cadan

cadan — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:18:57 +0000

i like jarrett jack better than nate or CJ

By: Xraided

Xraided — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:14:48 +0000

27.

Sessions wants to be a starter first and foremost. i would love him as a backup, but it seems highly improbable at this point.

although i’m sure Curry will be hurt at some point, and either Sessions or Brooks would outplay the man IMO.

By: Xraided

Xraided — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:11:54 +0000

joe

that leaves our bench very thin and uncertain. besides, you need a proven player behind you injury prone starters. you want to count on Jenkins and a D-league player? no thanks.

By: John Starks

John Starks — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:07:46 +0000

I liked CJ but what’s wrong with Nate? He’s earned some Bay Area love, especially because he’s 1/1000th Filipino or whatever. Warrior fans are fascinated by over-achieving small guys – even my sister wanted a Nate jersey last season.

By: reppinwarriors

reppinwarriors — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 19:02:02 +0000

i liked CJ Watson while he was here but this is the guy who convinced the warriors to not match his contract so he can play with the Bulls..id look at Sessions or Brooks if he didnt cost too much. Sessions did suck in the playoffs but he was a starter for a Lakers team and would be a solid backup for us. Not many good PGs out there left that fits what we need.

By: joe suspect

joe suspect — Wed, 11 Jul 2012 18:38:53 +0000

why would you spend vet min to mid-level $$$ on a less than average player, as opposed to a cheaper d-league/undrafted rookie with more upside that costs less? we’re not talking about a stop-gap starter…we’re talking about a 500 minute/year player here.

No to Brooks, Watson, Robinson, Delonte, etc…Let Jenkins get the backup minutes and sign a 15th man @ PG and develop him on the cheap.