Comments on: Warriors PG Jarrett Jack Misses Practice; What is Kent Bazemore’s Fate?

By: Niners in 2012

Niners in 2012 — Mon, 07 Jan 2013 01:36:51 +0000

Bazemores antics get the attention of opposing teams. It comes off as over the top celebrating. I thought Mark Jackson preached “don’t get too high, don’t get too low”.

By: Incredible

Incredible — Sat, 05 Jan 2013 21:53:11 +0000

I come to love watching Bazemore on the bench. He has got to be the best, happiest, most excited and positive force on the bench I’ve ever seen. It’s like he’s their number one supporter.

By: citznkane1

citznkane1 — Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:06:37 +0000

Yikes, no healthy Jack against Clippers rematch? Even with the Clippers on the back end of back to back, they were going to be tough, but without the W’s full talent available, this puts BIG pressure on the W’s to play “Nellie Ball” – SCORE-SCORE-SCORE to win. Will the “kids” – Curry-Thompson-Barnes be up to it? We’ll need all three to be scoring 15-20 or better apiece. No “rookie-sophmore disappearance” can be tolerated if the W’s are to be competitive tonight. It’s too much to ask Lee-Landry to carry all the W’s water tonight. Otherwise, look for Clipper’s Paul, Griffin, et. all, to show why they are the Division Leaders.

By: Stan

Stan — Sat, 05 Jan 2013 20:05:33 +0000

wow- your right Brent. How could I forget the earthquake year?
Still,the bay area’s return to being the winningest area is well earned and due. I couldn’t take another Monta small ball year for starts..

By: soothsayer

soothsayer — Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:56:46 +0000

Bazemore has tremendous upside. They’d be foolish to waive him. He was one a very few players who really stood out in summer league and he dominates in the development league on those off days that the W’s send him down to get playing time.

By: 11 Games - Page 3

11 Games - Page 3 — Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:53:52 +0000

[...] might be out tonight. Warriors PG Jarrett Jack Misses Practice; What is Kent Bazemore’s Fate? – Inside the Warriors … __________________ He has won the lifetime achievement award…twice. He threw a perfect game. [...]

By: petaluman

petaluman — Sat, 05 Jan 2013 18:18:18 +0000

We’re so close to getting under, I wouldn’t be surprised to see the FO make a move at some point. We have until the end of the season to drop the 900K.

However, I think current ownership may be willing to pay the tax if the team makes the playoffs, and we should all congratulate them on that! Their commitment to building a winning team is a breath of fresh air for Warriors basketball. Also, the repeater tax doesn’t kick in until the 2014-15 season.

By: Brent

Brent — Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:52:42 +0000

Stan: you don’t need to go back to 1975. In 1989, The Niners were Super Bowl champs, and both the Giants and A’s were in the World Series. In 1993, the Giants won 103 games, the Niners were in the NFC Championship game, and the Warriors won 50 games.

I agree that it’s nice to see the Giants, Niners, and Warriors playing well at the same time, but you don’t have to go back to 1975 (when the Niners and Giants weren’t playing well, by the way) to find the last time.

By: Twinkie defense

Twinkie defense — Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:38:56 +0000

That’s all well and good, but to be clear, by being over the luxury tax threshold the Warriors not only have to pay the tax, they also don’t get to take part in the redistribution, wich would bring something like a few million to the Warriors.

By: Nigel Tufnel

Nigel Tufnel — Sat, 05 Jan 2013 08:19:31 +0000

The problem with the Dubs being over the luxury tax line isn’t the tax they’d pay. The problem is being just $1 over the line means you do not receive any of the money that is distributed from the luxury tax-paying teams to the non-tax-paying teams. Which could be a lot more than the amount of luxury tax they’d pay.